Army memoirs: Taking command and responsibility
Previously, in Army memoirs: Pilot, i said,
Such issues confronted me as i took command. Thankfully, i had an “upper-study”. Also, i entered a 1st-year battalion. That means, these young men have just enlisted into the military as conscripts. They are new to the whole concept of conscription and what comes along with it. On the other hand, i was entering into my 2nd year as a conscript. I had a slight upper hand. Or so i thought.
Taking command is not an easy feat. As recruits going through Basic Military Training (BMT), we think we know what is command. Those who have the basic educational requirements to go for officer training at OCS think that their experiences at Junior Colleges (JCs) or Polytechnics have already shaped them in some way to be a leader. Most of them are right. But not all the time.
You see, organising a class chalet or outing is starkly different from conducting a 5km run for the entire battalion at East Coast Park. Neither is organising a 1-week camp for your School’s Sports team comparable to conducting a 3-day-long live firing exercise. They are different things, requiring different sets of skills, aids, and competencies.

Today, I will attempt to talk a little more about my command experiences as a platoon commander in the military. However, i will not relate it chronologically; it will get too boring. Besides, many of such experiences are common, like field camp, exercises, etc. i blogged about them previously (FTX, BPT, ATP)
i will highlight the more personally relevant and important ones.
~ ~ ~
I have avoided discussing this incident with many people. So why this change to broadcast it on the WWW? Because, i think its about time i take stock, share the experience, learn and move on.
I was the Battalion Duty Officer (BDO) that Friday. On Saturday i normally have driving lessons and my instructor could only make it at an early time of 8 a.m., coincidentally the handover-takeover time. I sent a message to Saturday’s BDO, R., to come earlier. Of course he could not. Everyone is entitled to their Friday night. And coming slightly earlier for a coursemate with whom i spent 23 weeks suffering together is not possible for R. What could i say?
I did the unspeakable. I did what even a private would know is wrong. I left my position of duty at 7.30 a.m., that i might reach the driving instructor’s pick up place at 8 a.m., that i might not lose 30minutes of driving time or good money paid for the lesson. Obviously my priorities are wrong. What is money compared to 30 more minutes in the camp, where i was entrusted with the responsibility to oversee the security and safety of the camp?
I was punished for my deed. Severely. I was charged and have a military record, forever to my name. I was denied promotion to a 2-bar full lieutenant when every of my coursemates and colleagues in my camp dawned the 2-bars. I was advised i should never sign on for the army (i actually intended to sign on as a medical officer when i graduate) Should i feel the shame? Yes i think i was meant to. But it was not that simple.
R. and the deputy operations officer (DyS3), T., are the main people who helped me learn my lesson. R. was lamenting to fellow officers (same ranks) during lunch on Monday on my deed, what i did. He was of course, just lamenting. He messaged me on Monday morning, wanting to “just let me know that 2 sergeants in his company did something similar and the Officer-Commanding charged them.” I was still in slumber, i thought, “What are you trying to tell me? I did it already. What’s your problem now?” I ignored his message, did not repent of my wrongdoing, and went about my daily duties as a tank PC.
During his lamenting, T. was one of the listeners. He called me in the afternoon to confirm if what R. alleged was true. I admitted, and was tempted to tell him, “Hey don’t tell S3 yea?” But somehow i did not, i thought he wouldn’t, and it turned out to be a wrong move on my part.
T. was a fellow armour officer. We too went through the 02/04 Armour Officer Cadet Course, though he was an Armour Infantry officer, and i was a Tank Officer. Our training was separate and surely the bond is not there. So that’s that. Our only other interaction was during application to medical school. He was an aspiring doctor too. He was deciding between Monash and Melbourne, and my quick reply was “Monash!! It’s only 5-years!”
The turn of events next was inevitable. Self-righteous* T. told my unforgivable deed to S3. I was summoned, reprimanded, and promised to be given the worst punishment i can ever get as an officer, less the de-commissioning (which requires the President of Singapore’s approval).
* i mean this in a good way. a sense of righteousness that the right has be ensured and wrong should be punished. no compromise.
So i dealt with the punishment. I was to be charged. Thankfully, i had already signed up for Special Operations Force (SOF) selection. That was to be in the next 3 weeks. It provided an escape. I had one week left in camp, my meet with the Brigade Commander will be delayed, because they can’t get things done so quickly in the SAF. Procedures have to be followed. During this one week, i told no one, not even my own family members or girlfriend. I only told close colleagues. And one i bitched to the most was Junren. He was both a running companion and a listening ear. Till now I cherish our friendship.
The 3-week SOF selection provided an escape from my camp, the people and reality. Here, i focused on surviving. I focused on staying mentally strong. I focused on forging new friendships and encouraging one another. I focused on not giving in to the taunts and mental games the SOF instructors played with us and me. I focused on staying afloat as long as possible, with this mentality in mind, “If i don’t give up, they have no reason to kick me out.”
Day by day the number of candidates decreased from over 50 to only 7. (Read here and here) Did i think about my punishment to come when i head back to my home camp? Hell yea. And each time we went through each of the designed-to-torture “evolutions”, i treated them as a punishment. A punishment for what i did wrong. After all, I deserved it.

~ ~ ~
I headed back to camp at the end of 3 weeks, proud that i did not give up. However, soon after, the manpower officer carried on with the military law dealings and had me brought to the Brigade Officer to be charged.
I actually wanted to ask him this, but did not.
“Sir, what would you think of a fellow course-mate who ‘pau tow’ (tip you off so you get a punishment or scolding as a result) you?”
I really wonder. I struggled to think what i would think of T. On one hand, he did what was right in the duties of a fellow officer, in not condoning negligent attitudes. If T. did not realise it, it was also a timely reminder for the rest of my medical career of the importance of responsibility. On the other hand, many before me had done similar things, and fellow BDOs just keep silent and “cover up” for one another. In fact, we had a similar “T.” who had a higher profile than many. He is the Prime Minister’s son. He did something similar, on a larger scale.
~ ~ MEDICAL BLOGGERS COMMENT HERE~
On this note, i ask the medical bloggers (if any of you have been reading my boring account). Have you ever ‘covered up’ for a colleague’s acts of ill responsibility or acts of negligence?
The textbook answer is out there. I know it. We all owe a duty of care to the patient. And in my military context, I owed a duty of care and responsibility to the soldiers of the camp. I have breached this duty of care. But legally speaking, it did not directly cause a calamity or incident to occur. Hence, it will be insufficient to charge me of negligence, because the conditions of breach duty of care and the negative outcome is directly caused by this breach are absent. I might have a case then?
Doctors, and nurses, we are taught that if a colleague is suspected of drug or alcohol abuse, and turns up for work, we are to report it to a superior. This is in the health professional’s best interests and mainly, the patients’ best interests because once again we owe them a duty of care. By not reporting such a case, and if an unfavourable outcome for a patient (e.g. wrong treatment plan) occurs because of that particular physician’s poor decision making due to the influence of alcohol or drugs, will one be liable for negligence?

~ ~ ~
It had not been easy to come to terms, especially for a generally rank-conscious soldier like me. I walk around in camp as a 2nd lieutenant, although i know i had a year or so of experience as a platoon commander and officer. (2nd lieutenants in the SAF normally get promoted to full lieutenants after a year of acceptable service)
~ ~ ~
The tank sergeants came to talk to me when i came back from SOF selection. They know i had just been charged. They all asked if i was OK. I was extremely appreciative. Their concern helped heal the wounds. They told me the sergeants in R.’s company don’t like him at all. They tried to make me feel better.
~ ~ ~
When i was coerced to take the Advanced Close Combat Training (ACCT) course when i was about to finish my 2-year National Service, we had to wear our army uniforms (no.4) which bore our rank. Everyone of my fellow PCs had their shiny new amulets with 2bars. I stood there as a 1-bar, in front of ALL the men, ALL the sergeants. I bit my lips, and went through those days of ACCT lessons and evaluation.
Then, as we were taking a break, one of my company’s sergeants came to me, and we chatted about University, this ACCT we had to go just before ORD, the future, and plans ahead. Then he said it,
“Sir, even though you are only 1-bar, i still respect you more than the other officers with 2-bars.”
That made my day, and my entire NS experience.












this is so touching. Well done jeff, for braving through it all.
You know, people like T don’t serve even the smallest level of respect .Im trying to restrain myself here, but I would hurl my entire vocabulary of expletives if I could at him. He is a shame, a disgrace, a bloody traitor, a bast”"d, a hypocrite, a wonk and a a pile of garbage.
Seriously, jeff, what you did was perfectly normal. In NS, we all do sneaky little things once in a while that is perfectly harmless. Thanks to people like T who manipulate the situations, hyperbolized the facts, and magnify the whole bloody thing, you get bloody persecuted for something so laughably minor and quotidian. I cant stand such bloody, pharisiac hypocrites honestly, people who think they have the moral highground to instruct and dictate other people’s lives. Of course, organisations have rules. But seriously, leaving 30 mins earlier? CMON! everyone has done that before! or at least the equivalent of that! People take MCs when they are not sick etc etc and do you know that not carrying an 11b with you at all times is a chargeable offence?!! Im sure going by this rule, half of the entire NSF cohort would have been charged.
Rules are to be followed, but not followed blindly. its your misfortune to have bumped into T, bad day I guess. i call them the yes-men, those bloody, fawning sycophants who would grab any opportunity to blow the whistle at their fellow comrades.They deserve nothing but a place in hell.
I am so angry, so damn angry.
no lar, yonanz. i think i deserve what i did. it was inexcusable now that i think about it. its hard to come to terms with it, yes because of the grey we are so used to in the army. but as an officer, i must be and had to be subjected to a higher standard.
did u know that as a cadet, any perceived “lack of integrity” will lead to an OOC (out of course)? yeap, and what’s worse, an OOC cadet will remain in the wing, be a store corporal, and see his ex-coursemates go through the course. the feeling sucks. i had friends who OOC-ed due to injury.
so don’t be angry. apparently what i did may not seem very wrong. but it was very wrong to T., the S3, the brigade officer.
Hi Jeff,
*warning: comment from a self-declared hypocrite*
Apologies, but I couldn’t help but notice that fate somehow has a wry sense of humour when I thought I detected a somewhat familiar flavour of ’self-righteousness’ from your previous post on 15th November 2006 — I refer to your post on quitters or stayers. When I read that, I was rather uneasy, but was really impressed by your level of righteousness and conviction in branding your friend a quitter (implicitly at least) so much so that I blogged about it myself. The uneasiness came from a self-recognition that I could never live up to those standards, and since I generally hold people up to the same standard as I hold myself to, I thought, ‘Wow, maybe he can really live up to that standard.’ But I am humbled to know that everybody can trip and fall sometimes.
Sorry Jeff, but I can’t agree with you here. When hierarchy gets too self-absorbed and self-important, it can sometimes (and often) lead to deterioration in healthcare, and that’s why we have in place procedures like time-out and encouraging whistle-blowing in hospitals. You are correct in your assessment that it is necessary to demonstrate harm when the concept of negligence is applied to medicine, but I’m not too sure that it applies to that of military. I’m sure that you weren’t charged with negligence per se, but more like abandoning your post? Might be plumb wrong though.
On the wholly practical (and ruthless) point of view, it is in a doctor’s covering up his own act that causes confidence in the medical profession to wane, and in doing so, he not only compromises his own reputation, but brings others whom he associates with into similar disrepute by virtue of his association with them. But saying so, I’m not too sure that I myself wouldn’t cover up for someone else if that someone else was of higher authority (e.g. my own boss), so yah.
If I sound confused… damn.
whats ur blog? leave it in ur name le. share it.
i have no comment about ur other comments.
seriously no. you dont deserve it. and I speak not only on behalf of you.
If one wants to charge another person, one can find 1001 reasons to do so. everyone is a rule-breacher of some sort. Seriously, do u have your 11B along with you all the time? Im sure there must be one particular day when you left it in your house. Congrats, you have just contravened SAF rules. Its charge time!
Im not saying we eschew all the rules totally and grant NSF total autonomy to do whatever they like, wihout restriction. But put things into context. Absent for half an hour. Big deal? No. Played up? Definitely. Its hard to pin down an example right now, but SAF takes innocuous harmless things too seriously. They have this tendency to inflate everything out of proportion. It seems as though the sky will fall and the Earth will implode just because you are absent for 30 mins, and I m sure when you make the decision to absent yourself you are already quite sure that your absence will not bring any detrimental consequences (snipers? intruders?) or inconvenience to your fellow duty specs or men. So since your absence was totally calibrated and inconsequential, why make a big fuss out of it?
You have very idealistic, very quixotic views of being an officer. But being a good officer who can “uphold” standards and be a role model to your men is not about toeing the line blindly and dutifully (wihout the thought process).
Theres something called the hindsight delusion. People have this tendency to delude themselves or brainwash themselves in the long run. People like to get into some sort of retrospective guilt confession and it always goes like this,” No lar..thinking back..mebe I was wrong lar.”, or ” no lar..I think i deserved it.’ ..”Now I look back, I realise my mistake.”
Why not, “I didnt deserve that in the very first place. And I hold firm to my beliefs.”
T and whoever blew the whistle on you are hypocrites, that’s all. Period.
I have my share of my punishments (both physical and mental), since I was at the lowest rank for two years. Being an officer, you have been trained to make split-second decisions for your men and lead your men, in times of conflicts.
You made a decision at that moment in time. In any decision in life, there are consequences. You would have know the consequences of your action, as you have weighed the pros and cons at the point of making that decision. There is always right and wrong. And of course, there is this grey area.
Skipping lunch to have some sleep in the bunk is wrong, but everybody get over it. My Artillery battery commander charged his gunners for smoking near the gun during dry exercises. That was seriously very wrong, he was instilling the need of safety at all time. If it was a “live” firing exercise, imagine what will happen to the WHOLE artillery battery. The effect of the New Zealand artillery incident was a clear example, though it was an accident. Lying low in army does not mean that soldiers do not make wrong decisions.
As much as I have my reservations about the army, when I was on active duty (be it tactical or not), I will not do anything to put my fellow mates in harm way. They have parents, brothers and sisters. I was in a minor supporting role (signal), but I still have to make decisions in my area of speciality. My small decisions will propagate to the rest of the battery.
It is good that you have identified what you have done. Tor no T, it is not about what he had done. Aiways remember that your resultant actions affect a lot of people around you, when you make a decision.
When you become a doctor, somebody’s life is on your hands. And they may have parents, brothers, sisters, sons, daughters, wives, husbands, etc.
It is you who decide. The rest of the people will be looking at you for answers. There is no glory and honour here, just life and death.
Just my 2 cents.
you are right, listener. that was something similar to what my brigade commander explained to me when he chided me. something MIGHT have happened in my 30min of absence and it was simply because i was entrusted to oversee all on duty in camp and yet i was not setting a good example by being away, hence i was being punished. i think its entirely justifiable.
i thank yonanz for your kind comments, but i disagree with you however. we tend to buy a middle ground for ourselves most of the time because we know if we were subject to the standards which we know we are to comply to, we will falter, so we set our own standards of what’s acceptable and what’s not. to you, what i did and not carrying 11b around all times are grey areas, but the consequences of both are starkly different. obviously. a serious incident might have occurred in camp and because as a DO i’m not around, i will probably be featured in the papers and crucified. the same cannot be said of not carrying your identity card.
do not sympathize me. the highlight of the article is 2-fold. negligence and if you have done it before, and two, how the encouraging comment lit my entire NS experience despite this grey cloud i bought upon myself.
DQ’s comment on msn: [added in for personal reference]
This is my S3’s comment after i asked him to read this article. I found him on facebook.
I salute you Jeff for your courage at that age. Have you even thought of using your experience to counsel those young men who have been ooced from ocs against their will for some reasons or other? I am not familiar with the process in getting a cadet ooc. Are they counseled or warned by their leaders before the drastic action takes place?
Of course to eliminate someone like a piece of furniture is the easiest way out. But, we must remember, the cadets are boys of 19 and 20 fresh out from JC or poly and not a chair or table. By shaming them in the public, cutting them out of the course, may just push them to become more defiant. Is this the most constructive way in nurturing our NS boys? Are we doing justice to tax payers’ money? We promote so much about yellow ribbon campaign….can we also be as forgiving to our NS boys when they are not even criminals? Just my 2 cents worth.
I strongly disagree with the stance taken by the authority.
It is hypocritical to circumvent the rules for “privileged” personnels while punishing the rest stiffly claiming a sanctimonious reason. I have seen worse things get past without charge during my service due to special relationships or sheer ineptness.
I applaud your reasoning and example as an officer, which is something that is rare in all levels of rank, commissioned and non-commissioned.
R is a complete insult to the Officer core as well as the Commanders because he could not put aside 30 minutes of his time to help out a fellow officer, more over someone who was a course mate. I am sure there are so many values which are supposed to be instilled into Officers and Sergeants alike on Esprit De Corps and Self-Sacrifice.
Additionally he bitched to his fellow colleagues instead of settling it privately with you. Unprofessional conduct and a behaviour which reeks of a rumour monger. While it is true that wrong-doings must be punished, only the honest are punished. The organisation has a long way to go if it wants to live up to its seven core values.
“apparently what i did may not seem very wrong. but it was very wrong to T., the S3, the brigade officer.”
Neither did T, the S3 nor the brigade officer gave a thought to your future career. Like you have mentioned yourself, the medical profession is one of integrity. For your information, a court martial can be considered criminal history. Who would hire a person with a “criminal” history?
Charging a person is not always the solution. Solutions are to be holistic. If an army personnel leaves his post 30 minutes earlier, that means anyone and everyone in the army who does so must be similarly charged.
These are some of the implications which a good superior, should consider before making his decision.
@3SG: thanks for your comment.
At some point, one’s gotta move on…
Thankfully, i did not get a court martial. Employer’s perspective on people with “criminal” histories vary. These are consequences which i have to deal with as a result of my actions.
I understand where you are coming from, akin to a big picture perspective. I appreciate that.
Don’t ask me how I navigated to your blog; I was nostalgic about NS days and somehow found my way here.
I won’t mince words, what you did was deserving of punishment, as you yourself have observed. What T. did and what his true motivations were, only he himself can know and confirm. If his heart is black, people will know it eventually and he will get his just desserts. So don’t worry about him and his character. In the same vein, don’t lament the fact that many people, including a PM’s son, break the rules and yet you are the one to get caught. Sorry but most people who drive recklessly do not get killed; some are exceptionally unlucky and get nailed. But in the end, for the “unlucky” ones, what got them killed still remains their reckless actions, regardless of the actual statistics on reckless driving and mortality rates. And if these people who got their lives cut short become the poster boys and girls for not driving recklessly, their deaths have some worth at least. Translating simply to your example, if you got scorched severely for the whole world to see, think of yourself as a poster boy for what can happen when an officer is caught in dereliction of duty. Swallow the bitter pill and take comfort in the fact that your lesson was probably learnt by many other junior officers of your unit.
A Reservist Infantry Officer
@Internet Denizen, thanks for dropping by. nostalgia is certainly something we all experience, given the substantial no. of months we dedicate to a certain purpose; in our case, being in the SAF is what binds all Singaporean males together, wherever we go.
as you might read, i’m overseas studying at the moment. occasionally, i start to wonder, all for what? to defend a hypothetical war that should never happen unless the ministers (which we are paying ridiculous amounts of salaries from everyone’s taxes to do their job) mess up?? should they?
really, at the end of the day, its the intangible lessons and experiences we take away that make it all “worth it”, because we lose out in all tangible fronts, e.g. man-hours, progress in career, job prospects, compared to equally aged young men from overseas, and local women.
last i know, male doctors who have completed NS get paid couple of hundred dollars more than their female counterparts.
Hi Jeff, just stumbled onto your blog from ‘Days were the Those.’
I think it’s very good that you have reflected and applied the lessons learnt from your experience. I applaud you for that.
Just want to add my two cents…
When I was an NSF, I was an SOA instructor.
For me, I was what some would call a strict instructor I guess. I was training specialists, even officers. These were commanders. If there was any lapse in their safety standards or integrity, then they had to answer for their actions. But there were many in my wing (trainees and instructors alike) who taught I was ‘inflexible’ or ’self-righteous.’ For a while I was very bothered about not being ‘liked’ by others…
At the end of the day, I realize there are two kind of people in the SAF. Whether NSF or Regular, they all fall into this category.
People who believe in the system. (What NS is for, what it means)
People who don’t believe in the system. (think NS is a waste of time)
I believe in the system. I do what I do because it is my duty to do it. It doesn’t matter what other people think about me because at the end of the day, I’m the one who has to face the mirror and my conscience.
PS: After becoming an NSmen, I realize that actually a lot of people believe in the system and are willing to go about their duties without complaints when they go for ICT. Maybe when we were kids in our NSF days, we were just immature kids who haven’t seen the real world…
@YJ: thanks for dropping by and leaving your comment. I appreciate your candor. I was asked to stayed on at SOA to be an instructor for the next batch of cadets, but decided that, if i trained 12 months to be a platoon commander, why should i change all of the sudden? Being a SOA instructor was very tempting; Taiwan, Ex Wallaby, India, who knows where else! I do not regret my choice to be a tank PC, i’m certain you did not regret your time at SOA too.
I’m surprised this hasn’t been mentioned, but as always, do anything you want in the Army. Just don’t get caught.
However, I believe in a higher rule. That in the event of getting caught, always have a justification for your actions. This served me well in the 2.5 years that I served, and really, ought to be the one lesson you should get out of this.